Labellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentation
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
On the Difference between Assumption-based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation
In the current paper, we re-examine the connection between abstract argumentation and assumption-based argumentation. These two formalisms are often claimed to be equivalent in the sense that (a) evaluating an assumption based argumentation framework directly with the dedicated semantics, and (b) first constructing the corresponding abstract argumentation framework and then applying the corresp...
متن کاملAssumption-Based Argumentation Dialogues
Formal argumentation based dialogue models have attracted some research interests recently. Within this line of research, we propose a formal model for argumentation-based dialogues between agents, using assumption-based argumentation (ABA). Thus, the dialogues amount to conducting an argumentation process in ABA. The model is given in terms of ABA-specific utterances, debate trees and forests ...
متن کاملComplete Assumption Labellings
Recently, argument labellings have been proposed as a new (equivalent) way to express the extension semantics of Abstract Argumentation (AA) frameworks. Here, we introduce a labelling approach for the complete semantics in Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA), where labels are assigned to assumptions rather than whole arguments. We prove that the complete assumption labelling corresponds to the...
متن کاملComputing Science On the Difference between Assumption-Based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation
In the current paper, we reexamine the connection between abstract argumentation and assumption-based argumentation. Although these are often claimed to be equivalent, we observe that there exist well-studied admissibility-based semantics (semi-stable and eager) under which equivalence does not hold.
متن کاملAssumption-Based Argumentation
Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) [4, 3, 27, 9, 12, 20, 22] was developed, starting in the 90s, as a computational framework to reconcile and generalise most existing approaches to default reasoning [24, 25, 4, 3, 27, 26]. ABA was inspired by Dung’s preferred extension semantics for logic programming [10, 7], with its dialectical interpretation of the acceptability of negation-as-failure ass...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0888-613X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2017.02.005